Technology
Microfluidic Emulsion PCR
Microfluidic Emulsion PCR
from N. Reginald Beer and John H. Leamon writing in PCR Troubleshooting and Optimization: The Essential Guide
PCR has traditionally been performed in microliter-scale reactions because larger scale volumes are prohibitively expensive and wasteful while the smaller scales (nanoliter and below) are impractical with available sample handling tools and detection systems. At the microliter scale, samples can contain mutually competitive and distinct targets, introducing amplification bias and competitive inhibition that degrade assay performance. Microfluidic Emulsion PCR has emerged as a technique to resolve these challenges by a combination of two enabling technologies. Emulsion PCR provides the advantages of fluid partitioning, namely elimination of sample bias and the ability to run millions of reactions in discrete volumes, while microfluidics simultaneously reduces the sample volume, introduces a level of control over emulsion parameters, and provides optical observability of the partitioned microreactors. Furthermore, since microfluidic emulsions can be made monodisperse in size, they allow the assumption of an average dilution per reactor to permit the exploitation of Poisson statistics for very accurate titer estimation. Microfluidic emulsions can also be employed to perform solid-phase amplification with bead-based assays, combining yet another useful technique with the sample partitioning benefits of droplets. We expect the advantages of both emulsion PCR and microfluidics will encourage new applications and the integration of these enabling technologies will improve PCR performance.
Further reading: PCR Troubleshooting and Optimization: The Essential Guide
from N. Reginald Beer and John H. Leamon writing in PCR Troubleshooting and Optimization: The Essential Guide
PCR has traditionally been performed in microliter-scale reactions because larger scale volumes are prohibitively expensive and wasteful while the smaller scales (nanoliter and below) are impractical with available sample handling tools and detection systems. At the microliter scale, samples can contain mutually competitive and distinct targets, introducing amplification bias and competitive inhibition that degrade assay performance. Microfluidic Emulsion PCR has emerged as a technique to resolve these challenges by a combination of two enabling technologies. Emulsion PCR provides the advantages of fluid partitioning, namely elimination of sample bias and the ability to run millions of reactions in discrete volumes, while microfluidics simultaneously reduces the sample volume, introduces a level of control over emulsion parameters, and provides optical observability of the partitioned microreactors. Furthermore, since microfluidic emulsions can be made monodisperse in size, they allow the assumption of an average dilution per reactor to permit the exploitation of Poisson statistics for very accurate titer estimation. Microfluidic emulsions can also be employed to perform solid-phase amplification with bead-based assays, combining yet another useful technique with the sample partitioning benefits of droplets. We expect the advantages of both emulsion PCR and microfluidics will encourage new applications and the integration of these enabling technologies will improve PCR performance.
Further reading: PCR Troubleshooting and Optimization: The Essential Guide
Real-Time PCR Instrumentation
Real-Time PCR Instrumentation: An Instrument Selection Guide
from Sandrine Javorski-Miller and Ivan Delgado Orlic writing in PCR Troubleshooting and Optimization: The Essential Guide
A paper from 2008 mentions that quantitative PCR is 25 years old but routine use of this technology has only taken off during the past 12 years. The first commercial Real-Time PCR instrument, the ABI Prism 7700, was introduced to researchers in 1996 by Applied Biosystems. Since then over 40 additional Real-Time PCR instruments have been developed by more than a dozen vendors. Because there are so many Real-Time PCR instruments available utilizing a wide range of technologies, scientists face a daunting selection task. The space includes everything from entry level (single color detection, a small number of samples, low cost) to more complex (over 5 channel colors and multiplex detection, thousands of samples processed in each run, and expensive system price). Key features differentiate Real-Time PCR instruments, and various criteria should be considered when selecting the instrument that best fits a specific scientist's research needs.
Further reading: PCR Troubleshooting and Optimization: The Essential Guide
from Sandrine Javorski-Miller and Ivan Delgado Orlic writing in PCR Troubleshooting and Optimization: The Essential Guide
A paper from 2008 mentions that quantitative PCR is 25 years old but routine use of this technology has only taken off during the past 12 years. The first commercial Real-Time PCR instrument, the ABI Prism 7700, was introduced to researchers in 1996 by Applied Biosystems. Since then over 40 additional Real-Time PCR instruments have been developed by more than a dozen vendors. Because there are so many Real-Time PCR instruments available utilizing a wide range of technologies, scientists face a daunting selection task. The space includes everything from entry level (single color detection, a small number of samples, low cost) to more complex (over 5 channel colors and multiplex detection, thousands of samples processed in each run, and expensive system price). Key features differentiate Real-Time PCR instruments, and various criteria should be considered when selecting the instrument that best fits a specific scientist's research needs.
Further reading: PCR Troubleshooting and Optimization: The Essential Guide
RT-PCR Optimization
RT-PCR Optimization Strategies
from Martina Reiter and Michael W. Pfaffl writing in PCR Troubleshooting and Optimization: The Essential Guide
PCR technology is based on a simple principle; an enzymatic reaction that increases the amount of nucleic acids initially present in a sample but this powerful method makes it possible to detect specific mRNA transcripts in any biological sample by the application of RT-PCR. The RT-PCR quantitative analysis workflow has several steps, each of which is crucial to the success of the experiment. It starts with a sampling step, followed by nucleic acid extraction and stabilization, cDNA synthesis and finally the qPCR where the mRNA quantification takes place. PCR itself is quite a stable reaction with reproducibility between 2-8% but the number and nature of the pre-PCR steps mean that there are many sources of experimental variance in the workflow. Reliable data can only be produced when the experimental variance is minimized, so the sources of variation must be identified and optimized for each step of each experiment. Typically, however, the pre-PCR steps are neglected and optimization is done for PCR reaction only. Optimization of the whole RT-PCR workflow is important and recommendations to reduce experimental variance and produce more reproducible and reliable results should be followed.
Further reading: PCR Troubleshooting and Optimization: The Essential Guide
from Martina Reiter and Michael W. Pfaffl writing in PCR Troubleshooting and Optimization: The Essential Guide
PCR technology is based on a simple principle; an enzymatic reaction that increases the amount of nucleic acids initially present in a sample but this powerful method makes it possible to detect specific mRNA transcripts in any biological sample by the application of RT-PCR. The RT-PCR quantitative analysis workflow has several steps, each of which is crucial to the success of the experiment. It starts with a sampling step, followed by nucleic acid extraction and stabilization, cDNA synthesis and finally the qPCR where the mRNA quantification takes place. PCR itself is quite a stable reaction with reproducibility between 2-8% but the number and nature of the pre-PCR steps mean that there are many sources of experimental variance in the workflow. Reliable data can only be produced when the experimental variance is minimized, so the sources of variation must be identified and optimized for each step of each experiment. Typically, however, the pre-PCR steps are neglected and optimization is done for PCR reaction only. Optimization of the whole RT-PCR workflow is important and recommendations to reduce experimental variance and produce more reproducible and reliable results should be followed.
Further reading: PCR Troubleshooting and Optimization: The Essential Guide
Controls and Standard Curves in PCR
Significance of Controls and Standard Curves in PCR
from Ian Kavanagh, Gerwyn Jones and Saima Naveed Nayab writing in PCR Troubleshooting and Optimization: The Essential Guide:
Whilst qPCR is a powerful technique, the results achieved using this method is valid only if the appropriate controls have been included in the experiment. Careful selection of controls and proper Optimisation of qPCR conditions promise generation of highly specific, repeatable, reproducible and sensitive data. There are strategies for preparing both negative and positive controls for PCR, when they should be employed and how to interpret the information they provide. Standard curves are vital for determining the initial starting amount of the target template and for assessing assay efficiency, precision, sensitivity, and dynamic range. It is important to know how to prepare standards, interpret standard curve and troubleshoot inefficient qPCR reactions.
Further reading: PCR Troubleshooting and Optimization: The Essential Guide
from Ian Kavanagh, Gerwyn Jones and Saima Naveed Nayab writing in PCR Troubleshooting and Optimization: The Essential Guide:
Whilst qPCR is a powerful technique, the results achieved using this method is valid only if the appropriate controls have been included in the experiment. Careful selection of controls and proper Optimisation of qPCR conditions promise generation of highly specific, repeatable, reproducible and sensitive data. There are strategies for preparing both negative and positive controls for PCR, when they should be employed and how to interpret the information they provide. Standard curves are vital for determining the initial starting amount of the target template and for assessing assay efficiency, precision, sensitivity, and dynamic range. It is important to know how to prepare standards, interpret standard curve and troubleshoot inefficient qPCR reactions.
Further reading: PCR Troubleshooting and Optimization: The Essential Guide
A Brief History of PCR
A Brief History of PCR
from Carl T. Wittwer and Jared S. Farrar writing in PCR Troubleshooting and Optimization: The Essential Guide:
The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) has become a fundamental tool in molecular research and clinical testing. A recent review by Wittwer and Farrar discusses the origins of PCR, its early evolution including adaptation to RNA, thermostable polymerases, automation, improvements in specificity and rapid temperature cycling. Perhaps the most significant advance is real-time PCR, combining both amplification and detection into one instrument as a superior solution for nucleic acid quantification. Real-time PCR is enabled by monitoring the reaction with double stranded DNA dyes or specific probes, including hydrolysis, hybridization, and conformation-sensitive probes. PCR product and probe melting analysis continues to improve in resolution, allowing greater sequence detail for genotyping and variant scanning. Microfluidic platforms and digital PCR are destined to find more applications in the future.
Read more: PCR Troubleshooting and Optimization: The Essential Guide
from Carl T. Wittwer and Jared S. Farrar writing in PCR Troubleshooting and Optimization: The Essential Guide:
The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) has become a fundamental tool in molecular research and clinical testing. A recent review by Wittwer and Farrar discusses the origins of PCR, its early evolution including adaptation to RNA, thermostable polymerases, automation, improvements in specificity and rapid temperature cycling. Perhaps the most significant advance is real-time PCR, combining both amplification and detection into one instrument as a superior solution for nucleic acid quantification. Real-time PCR is enabled by monitoring the reaction with double stranded DNA dyes or specific probes, including hydrolysis, hybridization, and conformation-sensitive probes. PCR product and probe melting analysis continues to improve in resolution, allowing greater sequence detail for genotyping and variant scanning. Microfluidic platforms and digital PCR are destined to find more applications in the future.
Read more: PCR Troubleshooting and Optimization: The Essential Guide
MIQE Guidelines Uncloaked
No matter how good you are at PCR, you can always learn something from the speakers we have lined up for our Getting the most out of PCR live online seminar series. These guy eat, sleep and drink PCR.
Next up we have MIQE Guidelines Uncloaked, in which Greg Shipley will give you the inside track on the requirements you need to satisfy to make sure your PCR results are suitable for publication. You'd be mad to miss it.
This event goes out live tomorrow (Tue 8th June) at 9am Pacific / 12pm Eastern / 5pm BST (UK) / 6pm CET. Click here to secure one of the remaining places on this live event..
You can also click here to take a look at our archive for this series, which now contains:
Magic in Solution: An Introduction and Brief History of PCR
Speaker: Carl Wittwer
Obtaining Maximum PCR Sensitivity and Specificity
Speaker: Cameron N. Gundry Attendence: 125
Significance of Controls and Standard Curves in PCR
Speaker: Ian Kavanagh
Next up we have MIQE Guidelines Uncloaked, in which Greg Shipley will give you the inside track on the requirements you need to satisfy to make sure your PCR results are suitable for publication. You'd be mad to miss it.
This event goes out live tomorrow (Tue 8th June) at 9am Pacific / 12pm Eastern / 5pm BST (UK) / 6pm CET. Click here to secure one of the remaining places on this live event..
You can also click here to take a look at our archive for this series, which now contains:
Magic in Solution: An Introduction and Brief History of PCR
Speaker: Carl Wittwer
Obtaining Maximum PCR Sensitivity and Specificity
Speaker: Cameron N. Gundry Attendence: 125
Significance of Controls and Standard Curves in PCR
Speaker: Ian Kavanagh
Detection of Microbes in Water
Molecular techniques based on genomics, proteomics and transcriptomics are rapidly growing as complete microbial genome sequences are becoming available and advances are made in sequencing technology, analytical biochemistry, microfluidics and data analysis. While the clinical and food industries are increasingly adapting these techniques, there appear to be major challenges in detecting health-related microbes in source and treated drinking waters. This is due in part to the low density of pathogens in water, necessitating significant processing of large volume samples. Quantitative PCR is a state-of-the-art technique available for pathogen detection and characterization from water.
Although quantitative PCR is almost 15 years old, only recently has it become a tool for diagnostic purposes in water microbiology. Conventional PCR and its variations largely give qualitative results (MPN-PCR being an exception) and are most useful when presence-absence of the target is to be noted. Since the product is measured at the end of the PCR, where the amount of amplicon (product) in a given reaction tube is likely to have been affected by saturation effects of excess amplicons or poorly optimized reactions, the yield of amplicon does not relate to the original starting concentration. Furthermore, a second step is always required for verification of the product. Because there is a quantitative relationship between amount of starting target and amount of PCR product during the exponential phase of the PCR process, if the yield of amplicons are made in the exponential or initial linear phases of amplification, which is the case in qPCR, then the data obtained can provide a quantitative relationship to the starting concentration.
In qPCR, fluorescent dyes and probes are generally used in addition to regular PCR primers, thus allowing for in situ assay of the targeted amplicon. With increasing cycles of PCR, the increase in target is directly quantified by an increase in fluorescence that is emitted by increased intercalation of fluorescent dye or hybridization of fluorescent oligonucleotide probe(s) to the target. These techniques are not "quantitative" in the strictest sense, as they measure a kinetic reaction. Often called "real time" or kinetic PCR, they do not measure the reaction as it occurs, but measure the results of the reaction in a pause between cycles. Perhaps the most correct descriptor is Kinetic PCR, but that term has not been adopted in molecular microbiology.
Further reading: Environmental Microbiology: Current Technology and Water Applications
Although quantitative PCR is almost 15 years old, only recently has it become a tool for diagnostic purposes in water microbiology. Conventional PCR and its variations largely give qualitative results (MPN-PCR being an exception) and are most useful when presence-absence of the target is to be noted. Since the product is measured at the end of the PCR, where the amount of amplicon (product) in a given reaction tube is likely to have been affected by saturation effects of excess amplicons or poorly optimized reactions, the yield of amplicon does not relate to the original starting concentration. Furthermore, a second step is always required for verification of the product. Because there is a quantitative relationship between amount of starting target and amount of PCR product during the exponential phase of the PCR process, if the yield of amplicons are made in the exponential or initial linear phases of amplification, which is the case in qPCR, then the data obtained can provide a quantitative relationship to the starting concentration.
In qPCR, fluorescent dyes and probes are generally used in addition to regular PCR primers, thus allowing for in situ assay of the targeted amplicon. With increasing cycles of PCR, the increase in target is directly quantified by an increase in fluorescence that is emitted by increased intercalation of fluorescent dye or hybridization of fluorescent oligonucleotide probe(s) to the target. These techniques are not "quantitative" in the strictest sense, as they measure a kinetic reaction. Often called "real time" or kinetic PCR, they do not measure the reaction as it occurs, but measure the results of the reaction in a pause between cycles. Perhaps the most correct descriptor is Kinetic PCR, but that term has not been adopted in molecular microbiology.
Further reading: Environmental Microbiology: Current Technology and Water Applications